Every page. Every answer.
Upload your documents. Legati reads every page, summarizes every document, and lets you search your case in plain English, with Bates citations.
Weeks → Hours
Same review. A fraction of the time.
Every answer cited
Bates number included. Click to verify.
Any document size
10-page brief or 500,000-page production.
Any file format
PDF, PST, EML, DOCX, images, ZIP.
11,000+ documents
Indexed in a single case.
Natural language search
Ask questions, not keywords.
Weeks → Hours
Same review. A fraction of the time.
Every answer cited
Bates number included. Click to verify.
Any document size
10-page brief or 500,000-page production.
Any file format
PDF, PST, EML, DOCX, images, ZIP.
11,000+ documents
Indexed in a single case.
Natural language search
Ask questions, not keywords.
How it works
Three steps. No learning curve.
Upload your documents
PDFs, emails, PST archives, scanned images. Drop them in. Legati processes everything.
AI reads every page
Every document gets a custom summary as if written by a junior attorney. Sort your entire case by date and view the narrative across custodians.
Search in plain English
Ask your case any question. Get answers with Bates citations you can verify.
Every document, organized and summarized.
Upload a raw production and Legati turns it into a timeline you can read. Sort your entire case by date. Filter by custodian to see who said what, when. See the narrative across all documents in plain language, not buried in legalese.
- Sort by date to see your case narrative unfold over time
- Filter by custodian to track who said what, when
- See across all custodians and documents what actually happened
- AI-generated narrative summaries for every document
- Automatic Bates numbering and export to Excel
Document Index
Enron Corp. v. United States — 5 documents indexed
Sub-Indexes
| Date | Type | Description | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/6/2000 | Email Chain | Email chain between Bill Lewis and Ken Lay discussing potential restructuring of executive roles in the new administration. | ||
| 11/27/2000 | Cancellation notice from Sherron Watkins to Board of Directors re: scheduled conference call on 11/28. | |||
| 11/20/2000 | Email Chain | Proposed additions from Jeff Skilling to Richard Causey re: Garten partnership report on pooling and stock options. | ||
| 11/27/2000 | Email from Jim Schwieger requesting approval for personal use of company funds for family event. | |||
| 10/24/2001 | Sherron Watkins to Ken Lay re: prior warnings about accounting irregularities and Raptor deal restatements. |
Ask your case any question.
Type a question in plain English. Legati searches every document and returns answers with specific Bates citations. Click any citation to see the source document.
This is not keyword search. Legati understands meaning. It finds evidence that keyword searches miss entirely.
- Natural language queries
- Bates-cited answers
- Click to verify source
- Finds what keywords miss
Deep Search
Enron v. USA — 11,048 documentsHello Demo, based on my review, I found several documents showing that Enron employees, including senior ones, raised significant internal warnings and concerns about the company's accounting, financial reporting, and partnership structures directly to top executives like Kenneth Lay before the company's collapse.
Sherron Watkins (VP, Corporate Development)
In an email dated October 24, 2001, Watkins references her prior, now-famous, warnings to Ken Lay. She writes, "I have clearly proven myself to be the only person at Enron that had the character, at great risk to my own career... to go to Ken Lay and let him know what was going on here." She specifically mentions more "bad news coming re: these raptor deals (ie, restatement)"
ENRON-006210–ENRON-006211Jim Schwieger (22-year employee)
On October 19, 2001, Schwieger sent a powerful email to Ken Lay expressing shame over a "$1.2 Billion Equity Adjustment." He accuses senior management of "lying, cheating and stealing" and states his belief that they "knew these transactions were being used to manipulate earnings and the stock price and took advantage of that knowledge to sell their ENE stock options," which in his opinion is "CRIMINAL"
ENRON-006311The way law firms handle documents is about to change.
Modern litigation generates tens of thousands of pages per case. Reviewing them manually costs firms hundreds of billable hours and tens of thousands of dollars. Most of that time is spent reading, not thinking, not strategizing, not winning.
AI doesn’t replace the attorney. It reads every page so the attorney can focus on what matters: the arguments, the strategy, the courtroom. Every answer Legati gives cites the source document. Click, verify, use it.
Legati was built by people who lived this problem, not by a tech company guessing at what lawyers need. Every feature was tested on real cases, with real attorneys, in real courtrooms.
Legati AI has completely changed how we handle document discovery. What took our team weeks now takes hours. We can instantly search tens of thousands of documents, find crucial evidence that would have been prohibitively expensive to find manually.
Joel Hoover
Construction & Commercial Litigation Attorney, 20+ years
Your data is encrypted and never used to train AI.
AES-256 Encrypted
At rest and in transit
Enterprise-Grade Security
SOC 2-ready architecture and controls
Never Trains on Your Data
Your documents stay yours
See it on your case.
30-minute demo. We’ll bring lunch or hop on Zoom.